×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Cisco Housing Study

File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-

Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment. Select a bubble to view comments.

Document is loading Loading Glossary…

AI Tools

Hide

Welcome to your personal document assistant, powered by AI.

You can ask me questions and I will review the document to provide answers with page references for you. Please be patient, it might take a second and note that I might not always get it right - if you have questions it's easy to check the page sources or contact staff to clarify.

Start with a general question and then follow up with additional questions to narrow the focus of the response if needed.

What would you like to know?

Powered by Konveio

Comments

View all Cancel

Add comment


in reply to Richard's comment
Thank you for your comment! In our analysis, we used a standard 10% vacancy rate, which is why we did not directly factor in remodeling of vacant homes. However, community feedback could support lowering the target vacancy rate. Current vacant units could be potentially rehabilitated. At the same time, it is important to keep a reasonable vacancy rate, around 6-7%, to allow residents flexibility to move within the community and to accommodate seasonal or recreational homes. If the community prefers a lower target vacancy rate, prioritizing the rehabilitation of existing vacant homes could become a stronger focus before pursuing new housing development, but some new development may still be required.
in reply to Richard's comment
Thank you for your comment! Rehabilitation is an option that can be considered. Feedback will also be considered for population growth, so this number has the potential to be adjusted. If growth remains slower, the number of new homes needed could be less than originally projected, and rehabilitation could help meet some of that need. Choosing rehabilitation over new construction would reduce the demand for additional infrastructure.
Question
I don't understand why rehabilitation is not being considered. Further, if population growth remains at current rates, less than 1/3 of the 422 new homes will be needed - and perhaps rehab covers all the needed homes. If rehab is chosen, would not infrastructure development be lower?
Question
The Economic and Market Trend statement seems to say the relative low value of existing housing will stimulate new housing development. Additionally vacant housing at 11% is stated to be high. Does the data point toward remodeling and updating vacant homes first before adding new homes?