Wimberley Goals and Objectives

I am uncertain as to how the replacement or reconstruction of the low-water crossing at FM 1492 and the Blanco, to take your first example, will reduce flood risk. There is no element of this crossing that causes floods. It was one of the few manmade structures on the river that survived the 2015 flood intact. Moreover, it is of one of the features of Wimberley, like the trees in the middle of some roads, the one-lane bridge on River Road, and Blue Hole that contribute to the community's charm and character. I expect that this was included because it appeared in an earlier report, but I hope that you will reconsider making this either as a firm recommendation here or even a suggestion for consideration.

Again, specify what type of flood event, 100 year or higher. Not sure this is feasible from a cost standpoint given private land ownership at higher elevations along River rd.

What is the goal of raising these (i.e. how high and at what cost)? Are they expected to be passable under all flood scenarios or say just 100-500 year flood events. Flood events typically raise the water level for at most 48-72 hours after which the river returns to near normal level. A taller bridge may be subject to damage from debris and be impassible for a longer period of time.